+222.3%
BMNR vs DECK
-18.8%
+241.1%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | +1.6% | -7.1% | -5.6% |
| 7D | +4.9% | -2.2% | +7.1% | +4.9% |
| 30D | +35.5% | -13.6% | +49.1% | +35.6% |
| 3M | +39.6% | -21.2% | +60.8% | +39.5% |
| 6M | +18.2% | -21.1% | +39.3% | +16.9% |
| YTD | -8.0% | -17.2% | +9.2% | -6.2% |
| 1Y | -40.8% | -30.7% | -10.0% | -55.9% |
| All | +222.3% | -18.8% | +241.1% | +94.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling