+142.1%
BMNR vs DECK
-17.9%
+160.1%
-90.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -1.2% | -0.1% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -7.0% | +5.8% | -12.8% | -7.3% |
| 30D | -23.9% | +7.9% | -31.8% | -24.2% |
| 3M | +2.5% | -11.4% | +13.9% | +2.4% |
| 6M | -18.1% | -16.6% | -1.6% | -18.1% |
| YTD | -30.9% | -16.4% | -14.5% | -29.6% |
| 1Y | -49.8% | +8.6% | -58.4% | -44.2% |
| All | +142.1% | -17.9% | +160.1% | +46.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling