+21.1%
BLDR vs EPAM
-81.9%
+103.0%
-70.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | -2.4% | +4.9% | +3.1% |
| 7D | -2.8% | +2.0% | -4.8% | -3.3% |
| 30D | -13.3% | +6.5% | -19.8% | -14.7% |
| 3M | -12.3% | +19.9% | -32.2% | -16.7% |
| 6M | -31.5% | -16.9% | -14.5% | -29.3% |
| YTD | -36.1% | -42.9% | +6.8% | -28.6% |
| 1Y | -54.1% | -30.4% | -23.7% | -51.4% |
| 3Y | -55.8% | -54.7% | -1.0% | -49.7% |
| All | +21.1% | -81.9% | +103.0% | +58.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling