-51.3%
BLDR vs EPAM
-29.8%
-21.5%
-76.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | +0.6% | -4.2% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -8.2% | -1.1% | -7.1% | -8.1% |
| 30D | +16.3% | +41.8% | -25.6% | +7.7% |
| 3M | -17.0% | +63.4% | -80.3% | -25.4% |
| 6M | -17.4% | +72.2% | -89.6% | -27.3% |
| YTD | -41.6% | -20.0% | -21.5% | -39.0% |
| 1Y | -43.5% | -9.0% | -34.5% | -43.1% |
| All | -51.3% | -29.8% | -21.5% | -52.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling