-99.8%
BIYA vs MTB
+42.5%
-142.2%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -0.1% | -1.6% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +1.3% | +1.7% | -0.4% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -21.0% | -4.2% | -16.8% | -19.5% |
| 3M | -74.3% | +8.9% | -83.2% | -76.5% |
| 6M | -84.6% | +10.9% | -95.5% | -86.2% |
| YTD | -94.2% | +21.5% | -115.6% | -95.1% |
| 1Y | -98.2% | +21.9% | -120.1% | -98.5% |
| All | -99.8% | +42.5% | -142.2% | -99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling