-99.9%
BIYA vs MTB
+30.8%
-130.7%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | -0.2% | +3.6% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +2.5% | -2.0% | +4.5% | +3.3% |
| 30D | -22.3% | +0.1% | -22.4% | -22.3% |
| 3M | -54.8% | -12.1% | -42.7% | -52.3% |
| 6M | -86.5% | +7.3% | -93.8% | -88.0% |
| YTD | -96.8% | +11.5% | -108.4% | -97.3% |
| 1Y | -98.6% | +21.3% | -119.9% | -98.9% |
| All | -99.9% | +30.8% | -130.7% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling