+11.8%
AZO vs LCID
-92.9%
+104.7%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.0% | -1.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -3.6% | -9.8% | +6.3% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -5.6% | -35.5% | +29.9% | -5.3% |
| 3M | -6.6% | -18.4% | +11.7% | -6.6% |
| 6M | -22.5% | -60.5% | +38.0% | -22.0% |
| YTD | -15.2% | -60.1% | +44.9% | -14.7% |
| 1Y | -33.9% | -78.8% | +44.9% | -33.4% |
| 3Y | +11.8% | -92.8% | +104.6% | +14.4% |
| All | +11.8% | -92.9% | +104.7% | +14.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling