-33.9%
AZO vs LCID
-78.4%
+44.4%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.0% | -1.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -3.6% | -9.8% | +6.3% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -5.6% | -35.5% | +29.9% | -5.3% |
| 3M | -6.6% | -18.4% | +11.7% | -6.7% |
| 6M | -22.5% | -60.5% | +38.0% | -21.4% |
| YTD | -15.2% | -60.1% | +44.9% | -14.6% |
| 1Y | -33.9% | -78.8% | +44.9% | -33.8% |
| All | -33.9% | -78.4% | +44.4% | -33.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling