+244.7%
APLD vs RNG
-31.1%
+275.8%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | RNG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +1.0% | +6.5% | +7.2% |
| 7D | +3.1% | -6.2% | +9.3% | +5.4% |
| 30D | -29.4% | -8.0% | -21.4% | -27.2% |
| 3M | -42.8% | +15.7% | -58.5% | -45.6% |
| 6M | -59.5% | +60.3% | -119.8% | -67.1% |
| YTD | -31.8% | +153.8% | -185.6% | -58.4% |
| 1Y | -46.0% | +172.2% | -218.2% | -68.0% |
| 3Y | +252.0% | +174.8% | +77.2% | +95.4% |
| All | +244.7% | -31.1% | +275.8% | +253.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RNG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RNG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RNG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RNG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling