+403.2%
APLD vs RNG
+130.4%
+272.9%
-71.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RNG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -3.9% | +5.7% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +4.1% | +5.8% | -1.7% | +3.1% |
| 30D | -11.7% | +19.6% | -31.3% | -14.6% |
| 3M | -40.3% | +67.0% | -107.3% | -46.6% |
| 6M | -8.0% | +88.4% | -96.3% | -23.0% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +155.5% | -147.9% | -23.8% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +141.7% | -57.7% | +32.4% |
| All | +403.2% | +130.4% | +272.9% | +266.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RNG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RNG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RNG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RNG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling