+220.6%
APLD vs ENTG
+18.1%
+202.5%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.7% | +2.6% | +7.1% | +8.1% |
| 7D | -12.7% | -17.1% | +4.4% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -34.7% | -23.0% | -11.7% | -22.3% |
| 3M | -46.1% | -10.2% | -35.9% | -42.0% |
| 6M | -64.9% | -17.8% | -47.1% | -61.1% |
| YTD | -36.6% | +52.4% | -88.9% | -51.2% |
| 1Y | -50.0% | +49.8% | -99.8% | -61.1% |
| 3Y | +190.1% | +42.1% | +148.0% | +120.6% |
| All | +220.6% | +18.1% | +202.5% | +189.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling