+403.2%
APLD vs ENTG
+44.2%
+359.1%
-71.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +6.2% | -4.4% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +4.1% | +2.8% | +1.2% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -11.7% | -4.7% | -7.0% | -9.4% |
| 3M | -40.3% | -0.7% | -39.5% | -42.2% |
| 6M | -8.0% | +7.7% | -15.7% | -15.3% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +65.1% | -57.5% | -23.0% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +74.8% | +9.2% | +24.9% |
| All | +403.2% | +44.2% | +359.1% | +266.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling