+220.6%
APLD vs ENB
+32.8%
+187.8%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ENB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.7% | -2.5% | +12.3% | +12.1% |
| 7D | -12.7% | -5.2% | -7.5% | -8.3% |
| 30D | -34.7% | +2.2% | -36.9% | -36.6% |
| 3M | -46.1% | -8.1% | -38.1% | -42.2% |
| 6M | -64.9% | -11.2% | -53.7% | -61.6% |
| YTD | -36.6% | +2.0% | -38.6% | -41.5% |
| 1Y | -50.0% | +4.1% | -54.0% | -55.3% |
| 3Y | +190.1% | +64.7% | +125.4% | +36.7% |
| All | +220.6% | +32.8% | +187.8% | +183.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling