+373.4%
APLD vs ENB
+67.6%
+305.9%
-71.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -0.9% | +2.6% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -0.2% | +4.3% | +4.1% |
| 30D | -11.7% | -2.2% | -9.5% | -10.8% |
| 3M | -40.3% | -10.5% | -29.8% | -36.9% |
| 6M | -8.0% | -5.1% | -2.9% | -6.5% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +9.0% | -1.4% | -1.2% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +8.2% | +75.8% | +68.2% |
| All | +373.4% | +67.6% | +305.9% | +195.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling