+76.4%
AMZP vs VOO
+91.9%
-15.5%
-27.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.4% | +0.2% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -3.3% | +0.1% | -3.4% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -6.1% | +0.1% | -6.2% | -6.2% |
| 3M | -2.1% | +2.0% | -4.1% | -4.4% |
| 6M | +15.1% | +13.0% | +2.1% | -0.7% |
| YTD | +4.6% | +13.6% | -9.0% | -10.2% |
| 1Y | +3.3% | +20.1% | -16.8% | -16.8% |
| All | +76.4% | +91.9% | -15.5% | -9.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling