+0.2%
AMZP vs VOO
+9.9%
-9.8%
-22.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +0.3% | -0.8% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +8.1% | -2.7% | +10.8% | +12.1% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -5.4% | +5.0% | +7.8% |
| 3M | -6.5% | -4.1% | -2.5% | -0.8% |
| 6M | -11.2% | +0.7% | -11.9% | -12.2% |
| YTD | +4.1% | +8.7% | -4.6% | -7.5% |
| 1Y | +0.2% | +11.0% | -10.8% | -13.7% |
| All | +0.2% | +9.9% | -9.8% | -13.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling