-99.8%
AMIX vs NTRA
+403.7%
-503.5%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NTRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | +0.2% | -2.1% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -13.7% | +0.6% | -14.3% | -13.8% |
| 30D | -62.1% | +19.5% | -81.6% | -63.2% |
| 3M | -46.2% | +47.8% | -93.9% | -48.8% |
| 6M | -46.4% | +61.6% | -108.1% | -49.6% |
| YTD | -60.3% | +43.3% | -103.5% | -62.4% |
| 1Y | -79.7% | +97.0% | -176.7% | -80.8% |
| All | -99.8% | +403.7% | -503.5% | -99.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling