-99.9%
AMIX vs NTRA
+389.8%
-489.7%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -1.2% | +2.3% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -9.9% | +2.7% | -12.6% | -10.4% |
| 30D | -52.8% | -19.2% | -33.6% | -51.0% |
| 3M | -80.0% | +2.7% | -82.7% | -80.1% |
| 6M | -80.2% | +63.4% | -143.6% | -81.4% |
| YTD | -88.1% | +39.3% | -127.4% | -88.7% |
| 1Y | -91.1% | +59.0% | -150.1% | -91.5% |
| All | -99.9% | +389.8% | -489.7% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling