+95.0%
AMDL vs RCAT
+963.5%
-868.5%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | RCAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | -2.0% | +11.2% | +9.7% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -1.4% | +6.0% | +4.9% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -3.3% | -1.1% | -3.8% |
| 3M | -30.5% | -43.2% | +12.7% | -20.7% |
| 6M | +300.9% | -43.2% | +344.1% | +345.3% |
| YTD | +219.9% | +5.5% | +214.4% | +218.6% |
| 1Y | +374.7% | -1.6% | +376.4% | +376.8% |
| All | +95.0% | +963.5% | -868.5% | +119.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RCAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RCAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RCAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RCAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling