+87.1%
AMDL vs RCAT
+471.8%
-384.7%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RCAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +26.8% | +11.4% | +15.4% | +23.6% |
| 7D | +10.3% | +1.1% | +9.1% | +12.0% |
| 30D | -38.3% | -22.0% | -16.3% | -32.6% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -51.1% | +42.4% | +11.1% |
| 6M | -14.4% | -56.6% | +42.2% | +7.4% |
| YTD | +206.9% | -43.3% | +250.2% | +263.9% |
| 1Y | +144.4% | -51.5% | +195.9% | +195.5% |
| All | +87.1% | +471.8% | -384.7% | +150.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RCAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RCAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RCAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RCAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling