+47.6%
AMDL vs LDOS
+7.2%
+40.4%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +22.3% | -2.3% | +24.6% | +22.6% |
| 7D | -26.2% | -7.2% | -19.0% | -25.5% |
| 30D | -57.1% | +16.8% | -73.9% | -59.0% |
| 3M | -29.8% | -1.6% | -28.3% | -30.2% |
| 6M | -22.2% | -1.0% | -21.2% | -21.5% |
| YTD | +142.1% | -25.8% | +167.9% | +176.9% |
| 1Y | +85.8% | -31.1% | +116.9% | +122.3% |
| All | +47.6% | +7.2% | +40.4% | +22.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling