+20.7%
AMDL vs LDOS
+9.7%
+11.0%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -34.9% | +0.1% | -35.0% | -34.9% |
| 7D | -52.7% | -3.7% | -49.0% | -52.6% |
| 30D | -65.3% | +16.4% | -81.7% | -66.7% |
| 3M | -40.8% | +7.4% | -48.2% | -42.5% |
| 6M | -12.9% | -0.3% | -12.5% | -11.9% |
| YTD | +98.0% | -24.0% | +122.0% | +125.8% |
| 1Y | +30.1% | -29.6% | +59.7% | +55.5% |
| All | +20.7% | +9.7% | +11.0% | -0.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling