+109.1%
AMDL vs LDOS
-27.6%
+136.7%
-53.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +0.7% | +1.0% | +1.9% |
| 7D | -30.7% | -2.8% | -27.9% | -31.2% |
| 30D | -43.8% | +13.6% | -57.4% | -41.3% |
| 3M | -24.5% | +4.2% | -28.7% | -22.4% |
| 6M | +44.7% | -8.2% | +52.9% | +54.5% |
| YTD | +204.0% | -24.1% | +228.1% | +236.6% |
| 1Y | +109.1% | -31.2% | +140.3% | +101.4% |
| All | +109.1% | -27.6% | +136.7% | +101.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling