+102.5%
AMDL vs BLDR
-69.3%
+171.8%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.6% | +0.9% | -18.5% | -18.0% |
| 7D | +37.2% | -3.0% | +40.2% | +38.9% |
| 30D | -24.0% | +20.1% | -44.2% | -32.1% |
| 3M | -1.0% | -17.5% | +16.5% | +6.1% |
| 6M | -3.2% | -16.1% | +12.9% | +1.7% |
| YTD | +232.2% | -41.0% | +273.2% | +304.5% |
| 1Y | +137.7% | -41.6% | +179.3% | +188.4% |
| All | +102.5% | -69.3% | +171.8% | +195.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling