+124.4%
AMDL vs BLDR
-39.9%
+164.3%
-65.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +26.8% | +5.5% | +21.3% | +25.5% |
| 7D | +10.3% | -2.7% | +13.0% | +11.4% |
| 30D | -38.3% | +24.8% | -63.1% | -41.7% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -11.7% | +3.0% | -3.2% |
| 6M | -14.4% | -14.8% | +0.4% | -8.4% |
| YTD | +206.9% | -35.9% | +242.8% | +238.9% |
| All | +124.4% | -39.9% | +164.3% | +148.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling