+164.0%
AMDL vs BLDR
-44.0%
+208.0%
-65.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.9% | -3.6% | +15.4% | +12.6% |
| 7D | +103.5% | -8.2% | +111.8% | +106.6% |
| 30D | -18.3% | +16.3% | -34.6% | -22.1% |
| 3M | +20.1% | -17.0% | +37.0% | +28.2% |
| 6M | +15.9% | -17.4% | +33.3% | +23.6% |
| YTD | +303.0% | -41.6% | +344.6% | +351.7% |
| 1Y | +164.0% | -43.5% | +207.5% | +196.7% |
| All | +164.0% | -44.0% | +208.0% | +196.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling