+109.1%
AMDL vs BLDR
-38.1%
+147.2%
-53.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +9.3% | -7.6% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -30.7% | +24.4% | -55.1% | -34.2% |
| 30D | -43.8% | +24.9% | -68.7% | -46.9% |
| 3M | -24.5% | -7.8% | -16.7% | -21.0% |
| 6M | +44.7% | -5.8% | +50.5% | +50.5% |
| YTD | +204.0% | -32.5% | +236.4% | +230.8% |
| 1Y | +109.1% | -36.7% | +145.8% | +128.7% |
| All | +109.1% | -38.1% | +147.2% | +128.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling