+117.8%
AMDL vs BBIO
+171.8%
-54.0%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.7% | -0.1% | +11.8% | +11.7% |
| 7D | +19.9% | -2.4% | +22.3% | +21.7% |
| 30D | +6.3% | -11.5% | +17.8% | +13.8% |
| 3M | -9.9% | +11.0% | -20.9% | -15.9% |
| 6M | +394.3% | +14.4% | +379.9% | +345.7% |
| YTD | +257.3% | -2.3% | +259.6% | +258.4% |
| 1Y | +508.5% | +37.7% | +470.8% | +400.8% |
| All | +117.8% | +171.8% | -54.0% | +31.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling