+115.6%
AMDL vs BBIO
+163.5%
-48.0%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.7% | -4.7% | -2.0% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +20.7% | -3.9% | +24.6% | +23.8% |
| 30D | +9.4% | -13.4% | +22.8% | +19.0% |
| 3M | +5.6% | +7.6% | -1.9% | +0.7% |
| 6M | +340.3% | -2.4% | +342.7% | +342.1% |
| YTD | +253.6% | -5.2% | +258.8% | +262.0% |
| 1Y | +443.4% | +36.9% | +406.5% | +350.5% |
| All | +115.6% | +163.5% | -48.0% | +33.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling