-99.4%
AMC vs NIO
-90.7%
-8.7%
-99.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.6% | +5.9% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -13.0% | +15.4% | +7.7% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -18.3% | +17.5% | +6.6% |
| 3M | +35.2% | -33.2% | +68.4% | +56.2% |
| 6M | +124.6% | -21.5% | +146.1% | +138.0% |
| YTD | +69.9% | -25.5% | +95.4% | +82.9% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | -38.0% | +35.4% | +9.9% |
| 3Y | -79.8% | -65.5% | -14.3% | -74.7% |
| All | -99.4% | -90.7% | -8.7% | -98.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling