-61.0%
AMC vs NIO
-56.4%
-4.6%
-89.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.3% | +0.6% | +7.7% | +8.1% |
| 7D | +6.6% | +6.9% | -0.3% | +5.1% |
| 30D | +14.1% | -4.7% | +18.8% | +15.5% |
| 3M | +31.3% | -28.1% | +59.3% | +41.1% |
| 6M | +126.7% | -41.7% | +168.4% | +154.5% |
| YTD | +117.9% | -33.1% | +151.1% | +134.7% |
| 1Y | +41.1% | -50.3% | +91.4% | +62.1% |
| 3Y | -61.0% | -54.4% | -6.6% | -57.5% |
| All | -61.0% | -56.4% | -4.6% | -57.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling