-2.6%
AMC vs NIO
-37.4%
+34.8%
-69.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.6% | +5.9% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -13.0% | +15.4% | +4.7% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -18.3% | +17.5% | +2.5% |
| 3M | +35.2% | -33.2% | +68.4% | +44.7% |
| 6M | +124.6% | -21.5% | +146.1% | +133.3% |
| YTD | +69.9% | -25.5% | +95.4% | +77.7% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | -38.0% | +35.4% | +4.9% |
| All | -2.6% | -37.4% | +34.8% | +4.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling