+40.2%
AMC vs NIO
-54.1%
+94.3%
-63.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.3% | +3.4% | +3.9% | +6.3% |
| 7D | +17.7% | -0.6% | +18.3% | +17.9% |
| 30D | +26.2% | -3.5% | +29.7% | +27.5% |
| 3M | +31.3% | -30.7% | +62.0% | +43.0% |
| 6M | +142.8% | -45.6% | +188.4% | +179.0% |
| YTD | +125.6% | -35.3% | +160.9% | +148.7% |
| 1Y | +40.2% | -53.9% | +94.1% | +97.6% |
| All | +40.2% | -54.1% | +94.3% | +97.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling