+93.7%
AMC vs HTZ
-69.0%
+162.7%
-39.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -12.5% | -20.8% | +8.3% | -10.1% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -7.7% | +7.7% | +1.6% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -13.1% | +17.5% | +6.3% |
| 3M | +15.4% | +14.7% | +0.6% | +16.0% |
| 6M | +93.7% | -70.6% | +164.3% | +109.5% |
| All | +93.7% | -69.0% | +162.7% | +109.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling