-99.4%
AMC vs HTZ
-85.9%
-13.6%
-99.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | +1.3% | +3.0% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +7.5% | -5.2% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -0.7% | +47.4% | -48.2% | -11.5% |
| 3M | +35.2% | -54.9% | +90.1% | +53.7% |
| 6M | +124.6% | -47.0% | +171.6% | +140.5% |
| YTD | +69.9% | -55.3% | +125.1% | +89.0% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | -57.6% | +55.1% | +6.0% |
| 3Y | -79.8% | -86.6% | +6.8% | -69.1% |
| All | -99.4% | -85.9% | -13.6% | -99.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling