+54.2%
AFL vs UMAC
+508.0%
-453.8%
-13.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -6.4% | +6.0% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +3.3% | -5.4% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -5.4% | -10.4% | +5.0% | -5.4% |
| 3M | -0.3% | +1.8% | -2.0% | -0.2% |
| 6M | +5.2% | +40.7% | -35.5% | +5.2% |
| YTD | +5.7% | +90.9% | -85.2% | +5.6% |
| 1Y | +10.2% | +151.8% | -141.5% | +9.9% |
| All | +54.2% | +508.0% | -453.8% | +56.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling