+8.3%
AFL vs UMAC
+129.0%
-120.8%
-11.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -2.5% | +3.2% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -3.4% | +1.8% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -4.0% | -15.1% | +11.1% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -0.5% | -10.8% | +10.3% | -0.1% |
| 6M | +6.5% | +15.7% | -9.2% | +8.0% |
| YTD | +6.2% | +80.1% | -74.0% | +8.8% |
| 1Y | +8.3% | +116.7% | -108.4% | +11.9% |
| All | +8.3% | +129.0% | -120.8% | +11.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling