+83.6%
AEHR vs NIO
-62.3%
+145.9%
-86.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | -0.3% | +5.5% | +5.3% |
| 7D | +18.5% | -6.7% | +25.2% | +21.1% |
| 30D | -11.9% | -20.0% | +8.1% | -5.3% |
| 3M | -5.0% | -30.5% | +25.4% | +7.4% |
| 6M | +155.0% | -20.7% | +175.7% | +176.4% |
| YTD | +349.7% | -25.7% | +375.4% | +396.8% |
| 1Y | +260.4% | -38.6% | +299.0% | +316.9% |
| 3Y | +83.6% | -62.3% | +145.9% | +115.8% |
| All | +83.6% | -62.3% | +145.9% | +115.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling