+255.3%
AEHR vs NIO
-37.6%
+293.0%
-47.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -3.2% | +1.4% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +23.0% | -7.3% | +30.3% | +27.3% |
| 30D | -19.9% | -22.5% | +2.6% | -9.5% |
| 3M | +0.5% | -30.9% | +31.4% | +20.5% |
| 6M | +123.6% | -37.2% | +160.8% | +179.2% |
| YTD | +364.6% | -29.8% | +394.4% | +453.0% |
| 1Y | +255.3% | -37.4% | +292.8% | +398.1% |
| All | +255.3% | -37.6% | +293.0% | +398.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling