+828.5%
AEHR vs GLXY
+12.0%
+816.5%
-47.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +13.1% | -0.6% | +13.7% | +13.5% |
| 7D | +6.7% | +13.4% | -6.7% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -12.7% | +38.1% | -50.8% | -28.1% |
| 3M | -26.0% | -7.3% | -18.7% | -24.3% |
| 6M | +102.2% | +8.2% | +94.0% | +90.4% |
| YTD | +327.2% | +17.8% | +309.5% | +267.7% |
| 1Y | +228.1% | +14.9% | +213.2% | +191.9% |
| All | +828.5% | +12.0% | +816.5% | +727.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling