+877.3%
AEHR vs GLXY
+15.1%
+862.2%
-47.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | +2.7% | +2.5% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +18.5% | +15.5% | +3.1% | +8.7% |
| 30D | -11.9% | +34.1% | -46.0% | -26.2% |
| 3M | -5.0% | -11.3% | +6.3% | +0.1% |
| 6M | +155.0% | +31.6% | +123.4% | +119.1% |
| YTD | +349.7% | +21.0% | +328.7% | +281.5% |
| 1Y | +260.4% | +11.7% | +248.7% | +223.3% |
| All | +877.3% | +15.1% | +862.2% | +758.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling