-38.2%
ACHR vs LNT
+3.5%
-41.6%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.9% | +0.5% | -7.4% | -6.4% |
| 7D | -9.2% | +1.0% | -10.3% | -8.4% |
| 30D | -1.0% | +9.6% | -10.6% | +9.6% |
| 3M | -42.2% | +5.4% | -47.6% | -39.4% |
| 6M | -38.2% | +3.1% | -41.3% | -36.4% |
| All | -38.2% | +3.5% | -41.6% | -36.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling