-21.1%
ACHR vs LNT
+48.2%
-69.3%
-67.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.7% | -1.1% | -4.6% | -5.1% |
| 7D | -2.7% | +0.2% | -2.8% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -12.1% | -0.5% | -11.6% | -12.0% |
| 3M | +3.4% | -5.5% | +8.9% | +5.1% |
| 6M | -15.6% | -3.8% | -11.8% | -16.1% |
| YTD | -26.9% | +6.8% | -33.7% | -33.8% |
| 1Y | -34.8% | +9.3% | -44.1% | -42.0% |
| All | -21.1% | +48.2% | -69.3% | -49.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling