+19.7%
ABNB vs ZETA
+281.1%
-261.4%
-37.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -1.8% | -2.3% | -3.8% |
| 7D | -4.4% | -2.4% | -1.9% | -4.0% |
| 30D | -2.0% | +15.6% | -17.6% | -4.6% |
| 3M | +29.8% | +41.5% | -11.7% | +21.5% |
| 6M | +31.0% | +63.4% | -32.4% | +18.6% |
| YTD | +28.6% | +51.3% | -22.7% | +17.2% |
| 1Y | +40.1% | +65.8% | -25.7% | +24.7% |
| 3Y | +19.7% | +279.2% | -259.5% | -20.1% |
| All | +19.7% | +281.1% | -261.4% | -20.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling