+48.8%
ABNB vs ZETA
+85.8%
-36.9%
-21.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.2% | +1.2% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +6.5% | +26.5% | -20.0% | +0.2% |
| 30D | +9.4% | +10.3% | -0.9% | +6.2% |
| 3M | +0.6% | +30.5% | -30.0% | -6.6% |
| 6M | +33.7% | +129.4% | -95.7% | +6.1% |
| YTD | +33.5% | +83.1% | -49.7% | +10.4% |
| 1Y | +48.8% | +82.1% | -33.2% | +25.0% |
| All | +48.8% | +85.8% | -36.9% | +25.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling