+98.9%
AA vs UMAC
+549.5%
-450.6%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | +9.3% | -5.8% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +14.7% | -13.1% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +3.3% | -0.5% | +3.8% | +2.9% |
| 3M | -29.4% | +0.5% | -29.9% | -30.2% |
| 6M | -12.8% | +57.9% | -70.7% | -17.2% |
| YTD | -2.1% | +103.9% | -106.1% | -8.7% |
| 1Y | +62.8% | +159.3% | -96.5% | +49.2% |
| All | +98.9% | +549.5% | -450.6% | +79.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling