+95.1%
AA vs UMAC
+508.0%
-412.9%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -6.4% | +4.4% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -0.6% | +3.3% | -3.9% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -1.6% | -10.4% | +8.8% | -1.3% |
| 3M | -29.8% | +1.8% | -31.6% | -30.6% |
| 6M | -16.6% | +40.7% | -57.4% | -20.3% |
| YTD | -4.0% | +90.9% | -94.9% | -10.1% |
| 1Y | +63.5% | +151.8% | -88.2% | +50.4% |
| All | +95.1% | +508.0% | -412.9% | +76.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling