+61.0%
AA vs UMAC
+164.0%
-103.0%
-48.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -3.1% | +0.9% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -0.9% | +0.2% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +5.0% | -7.7% | +12.6% | +5.0% |
| 3M | -35.8% | -26.4% | -9.4% | -34.7% |
| 6M | -18.4% | +61.9% | -80.2% | -28.9% |
| YTD | -5.5% | +86.5% | -92.0% | -21.4% |
| 1Y | +61.0% | +156.3% | -95.3% | +28.8% |
| All | +61.0% | +164.0% | -103.0% | +28.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling