+11.3%
ZTS vs UMAC
-58.4%
+69.6%
-11.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -4.6% | +5.7% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +5.6% | -5.2% | +10.8% | +5.3% |
| 30D | +12.1% | -36.4% | +48.5% | +8.1% |
| 3M | +11.3% | -58.6% | +69.9% | +4.6% |
| All | +11.3% | -58.4% | +69.6% | +4.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling