-39.4%
ZTS vs SCHG
+16.2%
-55.6%
-41.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -0.7% | +0.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -3.8% | -0.9% | -2.9% | -3.6% |
| 30D | -2.0% | -2.3% | +0.3% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -10.2% | +4.5% | -14.7% | -11.2% |
| 6M | -39.4% | +13.6% | -53.0% | -44.2% |
| All | -39.4% | +16.2% | -55.6% | -44.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling