+14.3%
ZTS vs QS
-57.7%
+72.0%
-15.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | QS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -5.2% | +6.2% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +5.6% | -14.0% | +19.6% | +5.5% |
| 30D | +12.1% | -6.4% | +18.4% | +12.6% |
| 3M | +11.3% | -40.3% | +51.5% | +8.1% |
| 6M | +14.3% | -57.5% | +71.8% | +10.1% |
| All | +14.3% | -57.7% | +72.0% | +10.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside QS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus QS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × QS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded QS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling