-56.0%
ZTS vs PLTU
+154.0%
-210.0%
-58.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -9.0% | +8.4% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -13.6% | +11.6% | -1.8% |
| 30D | +1.9% | +16.7% | -14.8% | +1.6% |
| 3M | -4.0% | +29.6% | -33.6% | -4.6% |
| 6M | -39.1% | -0.1% | -39.0% | -39.4% |
| YTD | -38.8% | -31.5% | -7.3% | -38.6% |
| 1Y | -49.6% | -19.7% | -29.8% | -49.5% |
| All | -56.0% | +154.0% | -210.0% | -58.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling